What expertise does a bicycle club bring to urban planning? And why is the Wakefield Bicycle Club (aka Safe Streets Wakefield) taking a lead role in peddling the Envision Wakefield downtown revitalization project?

The Safe Streets group had a table at the recent Living Well Health Fair. Ahead of the event they promoted their role via email and on social media.

“Look for us at tomorrow’s Living Well Fair being held adjacent to the Wakefield Farmers Market from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. We will have materials and graphics about the Wakefield Envision downtown redesign and (sic) discussing how it will transform and improve safety on the Main Street corridor. Please stop by our table and learn more about ‘Envision Wakefield’ – the project to revitalize our downtown. Learn more about the streetscape proposal (and the $20 million in state transportation funds at stake) to make our downtown a more attractive and safer destination for residents and visitors.”

Of course, the local bicycle advocacy group has the right to push any government project they want. But the public also deserves to understand why these activists have inserted themselves into this promotional effort and what their agenda is.

Their agenda is simple: bike lanes. The reason they are pushing Envision Wakefield is because it mandates bike lanes. Bike lanes are a condition attached to the town receiving the $20 million in the federal/state funding that is “at stake.”

Let’s be real. If not for Envision’s mandated bike lanes, the Safe Streets group would have zero interest in revitalizing the downtown.

They also know that bike lanes are unpopular, so they couch things in terms of “safety” and wanting to “improve the quality of life for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers alike.” Don’t be fooled, especially by the last part. They hate cars and drivers almost as much as they love bike lanes.

And don’t you dare question the assumption that downtown Wakefield needs to be “revitalized.” The central planners, most of whom aren’t from Wakefield, do not want to hear it.

So, I’ll say it.

Among the things that people like most about Wakefield Square is the fact that it’s not a cookie cutter downtown with a perfect, uniform look designed by an urban planner in some remote office.

Our downtown evokes the charm of a real small-town center, with its wide Main Street lined with historic buildings and businesses that have been around for generations. It has acquired a few scars and warts along the way, and that’s part of its appeal.

Wakefield has an authentic downtown that has evolved organically over decades – even centuries – as the functioning center of a real working-class community – a quality that certain “folks” with advanced degrees and high six-figure incomes can’t wait to change.

It’s not just octogenarian natives who have a fondness for the present downtown. Lots of younger residents also appreciate the legacy and heritage that it represents. And for many who chose to move here, the quaint, old-style charm of Wakefield Square was part of what drew them.

I understand that change is inevitable, and $20 million buys a lot of bike lanes, bumpouts and median strips. But when the price includes mandates that would alter the character of the downtown in ways that divide the population, would it be so terrible to leave things alone for just a while longer?
—
[This column originally appeared in the August 6, 2026 Wakefield Daily Item.]