Municipal self-loathing
Most people think Wakefield is a pretty nice town. We have two lakes, a beautiful Common and a walkable downtown area with some great restaurants. We have easy access to public transportation and are near two major highways. Oh, and we are one of the few places outside of big cities that still has a daily, family-owned newspaper.
And, of course, there’s Fred’s Franks.
What’s not to like?
But there is a small but vocal cohort that takes a strange delight in trashing the town, whether they were born here and decided to stay or they came here to live by choice. For them, Wakefield never seems to measure up to their expectations and the grass always looks greener in neighboring communities like Lynnfield, Reading and Melrose.
This municipal self-loathing is nothing new. Growing up here way back in the 20th century, I can remember locals thinking they were very clever and edgy when they referred to the town as “Wastefield,” and dubbed our Lake “Quannapolluted.”
It used to be that the audience for these rantings was limited to the barstools at the Three Cs or the West Side Social Club on a Friday night.
But the age of social media has provided the current generation of curmudgeons with a comparatively limitless audience and a safe space from which to spew their cynical rants against the town.
We’re not talking about constructive criticism here. I guarantee that these keyboard pundits seldom read a local newspaper, never attend Town Meeting and are among the 82 percent of adults who didn’t bother to vote in Tuesday’s Town Election. Based on some of their comments, I sometimes wonder if they ever leave their basements.
But they can tell you exactly what’s wrong with the town and they’re convinced that they are the only ones who have figured it out.
They crawled out of the woodwork recently after someone posted on a Wakefield community Facebook page an online list of the 2017 Best Places to Live in Massachusetts. The list, he couldn’t resist pointing out, did not include Wakefield.
It was one of those lists you see from time to time on the internet created by a “team” of “researchers” based in some out-of-state office park who couldn’t find Wakefield if you spotted them an atlas and a Garmin.
But they know how to crunch “data” in order to determine which are the most desirable communities in a state most of them have probably never set foot in. This particular list was created by a group of “analysts” working in Pittsburgh.
But this meaningless list was enough to spark a lively round of Wakefield-bashing in the Facebook group.
One commenter cited “high taxes and poor roads” as reasons Wakefield didn’t make the list. Never mind that most of the towns on the list (like Dover, Wellesley, Lincoln and Duxbury) have far higher taxes than Wakefield. And I’d wager that the commenter has no idea that the town adds several hundred thousand dollars to supplement the annual Chapter 90 funds it gets from the state for road maintenance. We could spend a lot more on road maintenance, but then that would mean – higher taxes.
A bunch of people cited empty storefronts and the condition of the downtown. Never mind that Wakefield’s downtown has a lower commercial vacancy rate than the national average, according to a 2016 market study commissioned by the town. And now we’re down to, I think, two empty storefronts, so the vacancy rate is even lower than it was when the study was done.
I’m convinced that you could wave a magic wand and upgrade all the storefronts in the downtown and people would still talk about the downtown looking shabby because it’s become a perception that’s rooted as much in groupthink as it is in reality.
Another person commented that Wakefield is like a big high school clique that’s hard to break into. I guess that’s why five of the seven members of Wakefield’s elected Board of Selectmen weren’t born or raised here.
One of the candidates in the recent Town Election claimed that one of the problems with Wakefield was policies that don’t encourage growth.
Meanwhile other people have been noticing all of the development going on all over town, including Brightview, the new Hallmark Health building in Greenwood, the two big projects on North Avenue, another one about to start on Lowell Street and two more large projects in the Junction area currently going through permitting.
“Welcome to the city of Wakefield,” was the reaction of one Facebooker worried about overdevelopment. Talk about a no-win for the town. Apparently the town’s anti-growth policies are turning us into Malden!
I don’t care if Wakefield is on some phony baloney top-100 list. But those determined to find every reason that Wakefield didn’t make the list might want to start by looking in the mirror.
[This column originally appeared in the April 27, 2017 Wakefield Daily Item.]
Filed under: Community, Feature stories, History, Humor, News, Opinion, Politics, Wakefield | Leave a Comment
Tags: business, city, Community, development, downtown, Facebook, Fred's Franks, Lake Quannapowitt, Mark Sardella, Massachusetts, Opinion, Politics, roads, Route 128, Route 93, taxes, town, Wakefield Daily Item, Wakefield MA
Search this site
Categories
Flickr Photos
Archives
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
Recent Comments
John terravecchia on High school math John Michael Terrave… on Brave New World Mark Sardella on Brave New World John Terravecchia on Brave New World Carole Scovel on Sentimental journey Blog Stats
- 351,762 hits
LINKS
No Responses Yet to “Municipal self-loathing”