State Rep rivals Brodeur & Lock debate
Both candidates running for the 32nd Middlesex District seat in the Massachusetts House of Representatives want to keep casino gambling in Massachusetts, but incumbent Rep. Paul Brodeur and his Republican challenger John Lock disagreed on most other issues as they debated last week at Wakefield’s WCAT studios.
The 32nd Middlesex District includes all of Melrose and Wakefield precincts 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Brodeur, a Melrose Democrat, has held the seat since 2010. He has previously served as General Counsel for the Massachusetts Office of Elder Affairs and as a prosecutor with the Middlesex County District Attorney’s office.
John Lock lives in the Greenwood section of Wakefield. He is a research scientist with advanced degrees from MIT.
The candidates fielded questions from a press panel that included representatives from the Wakefield Daily Item, the Melrose Weekly News and WCAT. WCAT producer David Watts, Jr. served as moderator.
Regarding Ballot Questions 3, which would repeal the law allowing casino gambling in Massachusetts, Lock said that he would favor keeping the current law in place.
“I don’t think it’s a silver bullet for the economy,” Lock said, “but I do welcome the jobs it will take to build the casino and to maintain it.”
Brodeur agreed, noting that gaming money is currently leaving the state.
“You can’t base your whole economy on a single industry,” Brodeur said. “But it can be a piece of a diverse economy like we have in Massachusetts. It’s a jobs issue.”
The candidates were asked about abuse of Department of Transitional Assistance programs like EBT.
“Absolutely I think there’s a lot of abuse,” Lock said. He accused Beacon Hill Democrats of obstructing efforts to audit the abuse, limiting the data available. He cited instances of high individual EBT balances and thousands of mailings to EBT recipients coming back as undeliverable. He accused Brodeur of voting against efforts to tighten up identity requirements for those accessing social benefits.
“We need to have these programs for people who need them and who are who they say they are,” Lock said.
Brodeur countered that the legislature has done “a remarkable job building comprehensive reform of the way we deliver welfare.” He cited measures passed that require checks on EBT balances every 90 days as well as cross-checking of data to reduce waste, fraud and abuse in the system. He also said that measures have been put in place to help people get off welfare.
The candidates also differed on ballot Question 1, which would repeal the automatic annual increases in the gasoline tax based on the rate of inflation.
Brodeur said that he supported the measure because a robust transportation system with safe roads and bridges is essential if the economy is to grow. He said the law would assure a reliable revenue stream locked into transportation spending. He cited several bridges in the area that were in need of repair.
Lock had a different view.
“Everyone understands the need to maintain roads and bridges,” Lock said. He pointed out, however, that Question 1 does not repeal the gas tax, only the automatic annual increases linked to inflation. The automatic increase, he said, “amounts to taxation without representation” and takes legislators off the hook with respect to voting for future tax increases.
Regarding the opiate addiction crisis, Lock said that legalizing marijuana for recreational use would remove it as a stepping stone to opiate abuse because pot users would no longer need to go to illegal drug dealers where they can be exposed to harder drugs.
Brodeur said that opiate abusers often start with prescription drugs and move on to heroin. He cited measures passed in the House increasing access to treatment. Brodeur said that it troubled him to hear kids talk about marijuana as risk free. “We need to view the drug problem as a public health problem, not a criminal justice problem,” Brodeur said.
Asked how Beacon Hill can become more transparent, Brodeur cited measures that the legislature has already taken, such as improving its web site, posting all hearings and agendas and inviting the public into sessions. He admitted that the state could do a better job leveraging technology. He cited his own efforts to be accessible and out in the community.
Lock insisted that Republicans have been the real champions of transparency on Beacon Hill. He pointed to measures that he said the GOP has pushed to increase transparency, such as making all committee votes public. “Democrats time and time again have voted that transparency down, including Rep. Brodeur,” Lock said.
[This story originally appeared in the Wakefield Daily Item.]
Filed under: Columns & Essays, Feature stories, News, Politics, Television, Wakefield | Leave a Comment
Tags: casinos, Democrat, EBT, election, gambling, gas tax, House of Representatives, indexing, John Lock, legislature, marijana, Mark Sardella, Massachusetts, Melrose, opiate addiction, Paul Brodeur, Politics, Republican, Wakefield, Wakefield Daily Item
Search this site
Categories
Flickr Photos
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
Recent Comments
John Breithaupt on Civics lesson Mark Sardella on The longest year John Breithaupt on The longest year Paul Sullo on PARK GATES ONCE FRAMED EXCLUSI… John Breithaupt on Straw man Blog Stats
- 298,762 hits
LINKS
No Responses Yet to “State Rep rivals Brodeur & Lock debate”