Wecome to Rosefield
Last year’s highly successful merger of the Wakefield and Melrose Health Departments has prompted officials in the two contiguous communities to explore other ways that they might cooperate for mutual public benefit. There has even been talk of consolidating the Wakefield and Melrose police and fire dispatch systems as another way to save both communities substantial money.
Those discussions have led almost inevitably to a proposal that comes as no surprise to those who have been closely following regionalization trends across the commonwealth. If the state approves the proposal, Wakefield and Melrose will cease to exist as separate communities two years from now, merging to form the new city of “Rosefield” in the spring of 2012.
The proposed merger of the two communities was spurred by the 2009 combination of the Wakefield and Melrose Health Departments, which has succeeded far beyond anyone’s expectations and has been held up as a state-wide model of how communities can regionalize services in ways that save money and are beneficial to all. The down econonomy and drastic cuts in state aid are forcing communities to consider pooling resources in ways previously unimaginable.
At a recent meeting of the Wakefield Board of Selectmen, Town Administrator Stephen P. Maio praised improvements in the delivery of local health services since the merger with the Melrose Health Department. “I think about where we were a year ago and where we are now,” Maio said. “The people of Wakefield are getting great service.”
It wasn’t a huge leap for local leaders to see that merging the entire governments of Melrose and Wakefield could expand that “great service” to other municipal functions as well.
Officials in both communities know that the proposal won’t be an easy sell but dismissed the notion that citizen resistance could block the merger.
“Most people opposed national health care reform too,” observed one local official who asked not to be named, “but the federal government pushed that through. The people don’t always know what’s best for them.”
The proposed new name must still be approved by the Wakefield Board of Selectmen and the Melrose Board of Aldermen, but officials expressed confidence that “Rosefield” would ultimately be accepted.
“We extensively focus-grouped all the possibilities,” said April F. Ewell, an aide to Melrose Mayor Robert Dolan. “We are efforting to make this adjustment as easy as we can for all the future citizens of Rosefield.” Ewell said that other possible names included “Melfield” and “Wakerose,” but the focus groups preferred the sound of “Rosefield.”
The new name also suggests all sorts of future marketing possibilities, according to Ewell. “I can see fields of rose bushes all over the landscape,” she said. “We could become a real destination for rose lovers, sort of like Holland with its tulips.”
But not everyone is on board with the merger and the name change. The Wakefield Historical Society has voted to oppose the name change based on the fact that Wakefield was named after a real historical figure, 19th century industrialist Cyrus Wakefield.
But others think that such opposition is overblown.
“If people really cared about Cyrus Wakefield they wouldn’t have torn down the Town Hall he gave to the town and his factory buildings on Water Street,” Ewell said. “Change is good,” she insisted, adding that Wakefield hasn’t changed its name since 1868. “Back then, some people wanted to keep the old name South Reading,” Ewell pointed out. “But eventually they got over it – or died.”
Some citizens in both communities have wondered what the proposed merger will mean for the historic rivalry between Melrose and Wakefield school athletic teams, particularly the traditional Thanksgiving Day football game.
But school administrators in both communities downplayed these concerns in a joint statement released today.
“As educators, we have always valued collaboration over competition,” the statement read. “Furthermore, this merger provides an opportunity to re-think team names like ‘Warriors’ and ‘Red Raiders,’ which glorify male aggression and are also offensive to Native Americans. We feel that the new team name, ‘Rosefield Blossoms’ more closely embodies the prevailing spirit of cooperation and teamwork.”
In Wakefield, a few officials have expressed reservations, fearing that what is being promoted as a merger is more like a hostile takeover, where Melrose city officials will end up calling most of the shots.
But Melrose City Hall called such concerns exaggerated. “This is for the good of both communities,” said Mayor Dolan’s aide, April F. Ewell. “No one is trying to fool anybody.”
[This column appeared in the April 1, 2010 Wakefield Daily Item.]
Filed under: Columns & Essays, Community, Feature stories, Humor, News, Opinion, Wakefield | Leave a Comment
Tags: Board of Health, Board of Selectmen, cities, city, City of Melrose, consilidation, Cyrus Wakefield, Daily Item, Heath Department, Item, Massachusetts, Mayor Robert Dolan, Melrose, Melrose Board of Aldermen, Melrose MA, Melrose Mass, Melrose Massachusetts, merger, mergers, municipalities, municipality, regionalization, Rosefield, Stephen P. Maio, Steve Maio, town, Town Administrator, Town of Wakefield, towns, Wakefield, Wakefield Daily Item, Wakefield Item, Wakefield MA, Wakefield Mass, Wakefield Massachusetts
Search this site
Categories
Flickr Photos
Archives
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
Recent Comments
Dr. Ed on Why the Warrior logo vote stil… Dr. Ed on Why the Warrior logo vote stil… Dr. Ed on Why the Warrior logo vote stil… WaffleCat on Why the Warrior logo vote stil… John Breithaupt on Why the Warrior logo vote stil… Blog Stats
- 317,487 hits
LINKS
No Responses Yet to “Wecome to Rosefield”