Town Suing Developer of Millbrook Estates
Claim that Falites hid excess profits owed to town
The town has filed suit against Falite Bros., Inc. and its limited liability company, Millbrook Estates, LLC, for breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy, among other allegations in a nine-count civil action. The town alleges that the defendants “retained or secreted excess profits of $1,324,019 belonging to the Town under the Regulatory Agreement.”
The complaint, dated December 21, 2007, has been filed on behalf of the town in Middlesex Superior Court by the town’s attorney in this matter, Stephen D. Anderson of Anderson and Kreiger, LLP of Boston.
The suit names as defendants Millbrook Estates, LLC; Ronald J. and Raymond S. Falite; Falite Bros., Inc.; Millbrook Rentals Realty Trust, (MRRT); and Pine Tree Realty Trust (PTRT).
Ronald J. Falite of 24 Walton Lane in Wakefield and Raymond S. Falite of 15 Ross Lane, Middleton are identified as members of Millbrook Estates, LLC. Falite Bros., Inc. and Millbrook Estates, LLC both list their principal place of business is 9 Broadway, Wakefield MA.
The suit stems from an early 2007 investigation by state Inspector General Gregory W. Sullivan into the development of Millbrook Estates, a 40-unit condominium complex on a 105,804 sq. ft. parcel off Water Street. The project was developed by the Falites under the Commonwealth’s affordable housing statute, General Laws Chapter 40B.
An independent auditor hired by the Inspector General found that the project’s adjusted profit – as a percentage of the total development costs – was 39.23 percent versus the 12.41 percent figure originally reported by the developer. Under Chapter 40B, a developer is limited to a profit of 20 percent of development costs. Any profit in excess of 20 percent must be turned over to the municipality for future affordable housing purposes.
The Inspector General’s report concluded last year that Millbrook Estates, LLC under-reported its sales revenue and overstated its project costs. The excess revenue that should have been turned over to the town, the Inspector General determined, was $1,324,019, versus the zero excess profit reported by the developer.
The town maintains in Count 2 of its complaint that in return for Chapter 40B’s authorization to obtain a comprehensive permit allowing the developer to circumvent numerous local bylaws and regulations, Millbrook and its principals agreed to limit their profit from the development. The Wakefield Zoning Board of Appeals issued that comprehensive permit on May 25, 2001. On December 19, 2002, Millbrook, LLC entered into a Regulatory Agreement stipulating that project profits would be limited to 20 percent of total development costs.
The town’s suit alleges that the developer used a variety of devices to accomplish its diversion of excess profits, including selling numerous market-rate units to affiliates and “straw buyers” for far less than the units were worth, thereby understating project profits. In addition, the developer claimed “unsubstantiated, unrelated and excessive costs, thereby overstating project costs,” according to the town’s suit.
Millbrook Rentals Realty Trust (MRRT) and Pine Tree Realty Trust (PTRT) are controlled by and related to Millbrook Estates, LLC and its principals, the town’s complaint alleges. Both entities were used as “straws” by the Falites to essentially sell condo units to themselves at deep discounts, the suit claims, and thereby conceal excess profits from the town. On May 6, 2003 Millbrook Estates, LLC sold four market-rate condos to MRRT for $746,136 and four more to PTRT for $727,156.
The Inspector General determined that the average arms-length sale price for condominium units of comparable size to the eight units sold to MRRT and PTRT ranged from $269,628 to $281,922. By contrast, the actual sale prices for the eight condos sold to related parties ranged from $174,869 to $193,849.
The IG’s total estimated market-rate price for the eight units was $2,222,815. The actual price paid by Millbrook’s related parties was $1,473,292, according to the town’s suit, a difference of $749,523.
“The Defendants’ steeply discounted sales of eight units to their related entities,” the suit asserts, “wrongfully deprived the Town of a substantial amount of excess profits which should have been paid to the Town under the Regulatory Agreement.”
Furthermore, according to information in the town’s suit, Falite Bros., Inc., an affiliate of the members of Millbrook Estates, LLC, was the general contractor, marketing agent (broker) and HVAC contractor on the project.
The town’s complaint also identifies project expenses which the town believes the defendants overstated. “Specifically, Millbrook claimed that it paid $214,362 in commissions to Falite Bros., Inc. in connection with the arms-length sale of market units.” However, according to an audit cited in the town’s complaint, “there is no evidence in Millbrook’s general ledger of any specific payments to Falite Bros., Inc. for broker commissions.”
The suit also alleges unwarranted commissions and marketing expenses were claimed on the eight units that the developers sold to themselves. “Given that the seller, buyer and broker were all related entities,” the suit alleges, “no commissions or other marketing expenses should have been taken by the Defendants on these sales.”
The defendants also inflated overhead and overstated other costs, the suit asserts. In doing so, Millbrook Estates, LLC “wrongfully reduced the project’s profits,” the complaint alleges, “thereby depriving the Town of these profits.”
The town’s suit also suggests that the Falites, as managers, “purportedly cancelled Millbrook Estates, LLC’s existence as a limited liability company” in December 2006, while the matter was still under investigation, in an effort to escape liability.
The suit notes that the defendants “have denied the Town’s claims and have not offered a reasonable payment in settlement.”
The town is seeking damages and restitution in the amount of the excess profits owed to the town under the agreement as well as costs and attorneys fees. The town is also seeking multiple damages for the defendants’ violations of Chapter 93A, and any other relief that the court may deem appropriate. The town maintains that it “is entitled to up to three times (but not less than two times) the amount of its damages, plus interest, costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.”
When these issues first came to light in the Inspector General’s report last spring, Raymond Falite issued a statement.
“We have fully cooperated with the Inspector General and he has issued his report to the town of Wakefield. I will meet with town officials regarding all of the issues which need to be addressed in the Inspector General’s report,” Falite said at the time. “We grew up in Wakefield, our business is in Wakefield, and we would do nothing to hurt the town.”
[This story originally appeared in the January 22, 2008 Wakefield Daily Item.]
Filed under: Community, Feature stories, News, Wakefield | Leave a Comment
Tags: affordable housing, Anderson & Kreiger, Anderson & Kreiger LLP, Chapter 40B, developer, developers, excess profits, Falite, Falite Bros, Falite Bros Inc, Falite Brothers, Falites, Gregory W. Sullivan, Inspector General, lawsuits lawsuit, Massachusetts Inspector General, Middlesex Superior Court, Millbrook Estates, Millbrook Rentals Realty Trust, Pine Tree Realty Trust, Ray Falite, Raymond S. Falite, real estate, Ron Falite, Ronald J. Falite, Stephen D. Anderson, Wakefield Daily Item, Wakefield Item, Wakefield MA, Wakefield Mass, Wakefield Massachusetts, Wakefield news, Wakefield newspaper, Wakefield newspapers, Wakefield Zoning Board of Appeals
Search this site
Categories
Flickr Photos
Archives
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
Recent Comments
Mario on Ox Bow Pet Shop Closing Marks… Ed Cutting, Ed. D. on Flagging allegiance Ed Cutting, Ed. D. on Flagging allegiance Nancy Trimper on Flagging allegiance NANCY TRIMPER on Flagging allegiance Blog Stats
- 349,067 hits
LINKS
No Responses Yet to “Town Suing Developer of Millbrook Estates”