Lean and green

07Dec24

It’s both humbling and gratifying when one’s advice is taken to heart, even if it’s for the wrong reasons and after the horse has left the barn.

In this space last June, I wrote: “One of the Environmental Sustainability Committee’s Guiding Principles is, ‘Reduce, reuse, recycle and compost.’” I added, “They could start by reducing their number of subcommittees.”

Four months later, the ESC apparently saw the wisdom of those words. At its October meeting, the Environmental Sustainability Committee voted to disband all of its countless subcommittees.

The Waste Reduction Subcommittee was laid to waste. The Green Business Subcommittee is out of business. The Climate Action Subcommittee has been deactivated. The Community Engagement and Outreach Subcommittee has disengaged. The Green Space Subcommittee has been displaced. And the Community Education Subcommittee has been placed on permanent sabbatical.

If only they had acted sooner, they could have spared themselves a lot of trouble.

In September, resident Scot McCauley filed an Open Meeting Law Complaint involving one of the ESC’s subcommittees.
McCauley’s complaint alleges that between Aug. 10 and Sept. 14, 2023, a subcommittee of the Environmental Sustainability Committee met in secret to formulate an article for the November 2023 Town Meeting seeking approval of the Specialized Opt-in Stretch Energy Code. The Specialized Energy Code includes net-zero building performance standards and other costly requirements designed to achieve strict greenhouse gas emission limits. The ESC-sponsored article was approved at the Nov. 18, 2023 Town Meeting by a vote of 109-33.

In his Open Meeting Law complaint, McCauley points out that there is no record of the ESC subcommittee that created this Town Meeting article and no agendas or minutes of such meetings were ever posted.

The OML complaint is still pending with the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office.

Also in September, the leadership of the ESC was hauled before the Town Council after several councilors watched some of the ESC subcommittee meeting videos and were alarmed by what their appointed committee was up to.

It turned out that the ESC had replaced its assigned mission statement with one of its own creation, and its various subcommittees were busy formulating town policies based on the goals the ESC had assigned itself. At the Town Council meeting, the ESC leaders acknowledged that one of their subcommittees had been working on a “town-wide climate plan,” a policy that would apply to all homes and businesses as well as municipal departments.

“Have we tasked you with that?” Town Council chairman Mike McLane asked.

The ESC leaders were forced admit that they had not been asked to create such a plan.

McLane urged his fellow Town Councilors to watch the ESC meetings, noting that subcommittees of two or three individuals had been busy putting together town-wide policies.

The ESC’s self-assigned mission statement was duly nullified and replaced with the original charge.

These are dark days for the net zero crowd. A few short weeks ago, they thought the phrase “Drill, baby, drill” had been consigned to the compost heap of history.

And now that Wakefield’s Environmental Sustainability Committee has jettisoned all of its subcommittees, who will “do the work” of saving the planet from incineration? Who, at long last, will hold back the rising tides?

ESC members lamented the fact that without subcommittees, the full board would now have to do everything, meaning longer meetings and limiting the amount of work that can be handled. One member groused that she wasn’t able to attend Town Day or the Electric Vehicle Showcase because if her fellow subcommittee member showed up, it would constitute a quorum.

To avoid running afoul of that pesky Open Meeting Law in the future, one ESC member suggested a catchy alternative to subcommittees: “individuals with initiatives.”

I guess it’s better than “members on a mission.”

[This column originally appeared in the December 5, 2024 Wakefield Daily Item.]



4 Responses to “Lean and green”

  1. 1 trop1

    Hi Mark, Just got this email and thought you might be interested in reading it. Who or What do we believe? Trop

    Global Warming Fail: Greenland Temps Have Been Dropping for 20 Years Straight

      Ian Schofield / shutterstock.com If you listen to the climate alarmists, you’re probably worried that we’re all going to die soon because of rising temperatures in Greenland. The island territory, the story goes, is experiencing such dramatic warming that its ice sheet will melt and everyone in Manhattan will drown as a result. The latest scientific data is telling a different story, however.   A group of scientists and mathematicians analyzed satellite data of Greenland over 20 years, from 2000 to 2019. They processed data from 31,464 satellite recordings to determine surface temperatures over the years across the island. It’s not getting warmer.   Between 2000 and 2019, the average surface temperatures in Greenland have dropped by 0.11 degrees Celsius. That’s quite a difference from what the scaremongering climate alarmists have been telling us for the past 40 years. Shouldn’t they be growing banana trees in Greenland by now?   To illustrate how ridiculous the anti-science global warming movement is, the World Economic Forum issued a report in September claiming that the Greenland ice sheet was at “a tipping point of irreversible melting.” The WEF report predicts that because of Greenland’s melting, sea levels will rise by up to 6 feet—within the next few months!   Unless they take dramatic action by banning cow farts and forcing everyone to eat bugs, the WEF predicts that coastal areas in the United States will be experiencing monthly flooding by the year 2050. What are they basing this prediction on if scientists have just proven that Greenland has gotten slightly colder over the past 20 years?   Global warming is fake. Anyone who believes in it is in a doomsday cult and needs to be deprogrammed. Every prediction they’ve ever made has turned out to be false.   *       
    

    >

    • 2 John Breithaupt

      “When you look at the yearly average, the ice-free parts of Greenland show a slight drop in temperature between 2001 and 2015. With swings in temperature from year to year.

      “However, these results should not be interpreted as “proof” that the Earth is not warming, say the scientists behind the research, which is published in the journal Scientific Reports.

    • 3 John Breithaupt

      Small local anomalies prove nothing. It’s what’s happening to the Earth as a whole that is significant.

  2. 4 edcutting

    As I understand Robert’s Rules (and I used to teach them), a body can only address business that is lawfully before it.  So if the subcommittee either violated Massachusetts law in preparing the article for town meeting and/or didn’t have the authority to present it to town meeting (and it appears that both are true) it nullifies the vote as the motion was out of order. It can be presented again, pursuant to the rules, but this vote never happened because town meeting wasn’t supposed to be voting on it.  So what happens next?  Does the town say “never mind” or do it wait for some developer to file a seven (or eight, or nine) figure lawsuit against the town? This is what upsets me about these folks — it’s not that I disagree with them (and I do) but that they do such STUPID things…


Leave a comment