Ethos, pathos and logos
Having endured two previous School Department “forums” on the Wakefield Warrior logo, my expectations were not high for last week’s “Warrior Logo Community Forum.”
Somehow, it still managed to disappoint.
For one thing, it was held via Zoom, which hinders participation by the less technically adept while favoring a demographic more comfortable with technology. If you don’t believe Zoom presents a technical roadblock for many people, consider that the forum started almost 15 minutes late because those in charge of running it encountered – you guessed it – technical problems.
Last week’s forum was billed as an opportunity for members of the Wakefield community to offer their input regarding a new logo to replace the old Warrior logo.
As you may recall, the Wakefield community already provided their input at last April’s Town Election. A solid majority said that they wanted to keep the old Warrior logo.
But the School Department does not view elections as a useful way to gather public input. Only Zoom forums that they control can provide the kind of public feedback that they value.
Confirming that the School Department isn’t all that interested in what Wakefield residents want, School Superintendent Doug Lyons explained at the start of last week’s forum that the logo change was “in response to feedback from Indigenous persons in Massachusetts and across the country.”
It’s good to know that nothing has changed in the past 10 months.
Last March, the School Committee assembled a panel of 10 Native American activists from anywhere but Wakefield to tell us how racist our Warrior logo was. (Out of respect for Irish-American culture, that panel was held on March 17 – St. Patrick’s Day.)
The panel of non-Wakefield Native Americans got to expound for an hour and 52 minutes about the evils of using an image of an Indian Warrior as a logo. After that, Wakefield’s Native American Bayrd family got to present their support for the Warrior logo in an eight-minute, pre-recorded video. In education, that’s called “fair and balanced.”
At last week’s Zoom forum, the school employed a rather esoteric methodology for gathering public “input.” A series of questions were posed and after each question, the public was instructed to type their responses in the Zoom “chat” box.
So, assuming you know how to use Zoom and assuming you didn’t give up while waiting for the forum to start and go do something productive, your only option for participating was Zoom “chat.”
The first questions asked people to “share” their “hopes and fears” about the forum itself.
All this may have felt perfectly normal to educators accustomed to teacher professional development sessions. But I was beginning to feel like I was in some sort of bizarre sensitivity training workshop.
One participant feared that Wakefield Native Americans like the Bayrd family would be left out of the process. What, the eight minutes they got last March wasn’t enough?
Participants at last week’s forum were then invited to “share” qualities that they associate with Wakefield High School that could be represented in a new Warrior logo. (Once again, you were required to use the very conventional and user-friendly “Zoom chat” to provide your input.)
There were a few suggestions that the average sports fan would associate with a team logo, like “strong,” “fierce” and “courageous.”
But one got the impression that there weren’t many members of the Wakefield Warrior football team on last week’s Zoom forum. By far, the dominant suggestions included words like, 
“inclusive,” “caring,” “respectful,” “compassionate,” “peace-keeper” “welcoming” and, my personal favorite, “part of the global community.”
I can’t wait to watch our new, caring and compassionate Wakefield Warriors on the gridiron, respectfully welcoming opposing players into our end zone.
We’re a long way from the days of Big Jim Landrigan, folks.
—
[This column originally appeared in the January 13, 2022 Wakefield Daily Item.]
Filed under: Columns & Essays, Community, Humor, News, Opinion, Politics, Wakefield | 5 Comments
Tags: American Indians, Bayrd Family, caring, chat, compassionate, courageous, Douglas Lyons, fierce, football, forum, global community, gridiron, Humor, inclusive, Indigenous peoples, Jim Landrigan, Landrigan Field, logo, Mark Sardella, Native Americans, Opinion, Politics, respectful, School Committee, schools, sensitivity training, sports Wakefield Warriors, strong, students, teachers, technology, Town Election, Wakefield Daily Item, Wakefield High School, welcoming, Zoom
Flickr Photos
Mark Sardella 
I guess I am missing something. Am I to believe that our competitive high school student teams, (athletic, dramatic, musicians, scholastic, etc.) which represent Wakefield and Wakefield Memorial High School, are actually participating in those programs with the intent to insult, disparage, defame, embarrass, etc. our Native American citizens? I certainly do not think such a thought ever crossed their minds. Having participated in WHS athletics, as well is having had the privilege of coaching at WHS, I cannot recall a single moment where any of my teammates, the athletes under my care, my coaching colleagues, or anyone else connected to the athletic program at WHS, that went onto the field of competition, ever had in inkling of those thoughts in mind of doing anything close to what I described above. Being a “Warrior” was a great source of pride for all Wakefield competitors as opposed to being a Spartan, Tanner, Red Devil, Marauder, etc.! Why are the “Powers that be….” so insistent upon stripping away that image of pride that is held dear to the great majority of citizens living in Wakefield?
You’re absolutely right, of course. As I’ve pointed out countless times, none of the School Committee members who voted to eliminate the logo, and none of the school administrators who are on board with doing away with the logo – none of them went to Wakefield High School. They accuse Wakefield natives of provincialism, but then they feel free to walk in and erase our traditions based on their presumed superior morality and ideology.
It’s actully is far worse than that Mark — get a good textbook on Cognative Behavioral Therapy (if you can) and you will see EXACTLY what is going on here.
CBT tactics were used in the Hanoi Hilton & DPRK POW camps -, it’s how they got brave American pilots to say the things the did.
Yes, Brainwashing 101….
The first thing you have to do is separate the subject from the subject’s culture. The problem with the logo is that it is a tie to the older generation and the goal is to sever all such ties so you can indoctrinate the subject to reject said culture.
They are brainwashing our children — that’s what most of the SEL is, and the sad thing is that the parents don’t even realize this. I’m not sure that the folk at 60 Farm Street do either as when this stuff is taught to educators, the psych folk neglect to mention the CBT stuff.
Some good news today in Virginia:
https://www.youngkintransition.com/blogs/post/governor-elect-youngkin-announces-selection-of-education-superintendent-and-assistant-superintendent
I found the discussion on Turner Classic Movies Channel about ethnic sensitivity in a historical context very interesting. They articulated well the rationale for not hiding movies from the public eye that portray bad treatment or insensitive characterizations of humans. They opted instead to make some contextual information available to the viewer, likely at beginning and end of the featured film. They apparently feel that a chance for education could be missed without that provocation.
Unrelated, I then read an article where the subject was said to have flown multiple helicopters while in the Army: Iroquois, Apache, and Blackhawk. Now there’s a sidebar mission for the school committee board members.